Browse > Home / Archive: February 2007

| Subscribe via RSS

Time running out on free $10 Google Checkout offer!

February 10th, 2007 | 4 Comments | Posted in Misc

Time is running out on Google’s offer of a free $10 just for signing up for their new checkout service that is similar to PayPal. The only catch is that you can only use the money through approved stores, but I promise you there are so many available that you’ll find whatever you need from their approved stores list.

You must sign up by February 15, 2007 and have the money spent by March 31, 2007. Even if you’re not ready to spend the money - sign up today!

Tags: , ,

How your broker is ripping you off!

February 9th, 2007 | 4 Comments | Posted in Investing

If you’re like me - you’ve got money sitting in your brokerage account waiting to be used on your next investment. I’ve justified this in the past because I feel like the more money I have in my brokerage the account, the “more serious” an investor I am. This silly logic is hitting me where it hurts - my bottom line. Check out the measly amounts of interest some of the major brokerages pay for money kept in a money market account as reported by MSN Money:

TD Ameritrade Holding pays just 0.1% on cash balances of up to $5,000 if you don’t ask them to give you a better deal. For cash balances up to $25,000 they pay just 0.4%. Up to $100,000 they pay 1.65% — even though the going return on money market mutual funds is around 4.8%. Ameritrade gathered $185 million in revenues by paying clients so little on their idle cash and then “sweeping” it into an account run by a banking partner, where the money earned Ameritrade a much higher rate. On average, clients held $5.7 billion a day in cash during Ameritrade’s last fiscal year, which ended Sept. 30.

E*Trade Financial pays the same as Ameritrade for the first two tiers, but for cash balances between $25,000 and $100,000 it pays out only 1%. On average, the broker paid just 0.87% on the $10.3 billion-a-day average that clients kept in brokerage accounts in the third quarter of 2006.

Charles Schwab pays around 1% on cash balances if you have up to $100,000 in assets, unless you ask them to do better. It pays around 2.6% if you have more than that. Overall, Schwab paid clients 2.56% in the third quarter of last year. Schwab earned about 5.1% and pocketed the difference.

Those numbers are pretty pathetic. I think it’s a shame that brokers don’t offer their customers a more reasonable return on their money. Sarah Bulgatz, who’s a Schwab Spokesman explains the “issue” by saying, “We really like having this conversation with our clients and educating them on what they can earn on their cash.” You see, they’re actually doing us a favor, by ripping us off!

Don’t give your broker a free loan [Michale Brush - MSN Money]

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

How does a “War on Terror Tax” sound?

February 7th, 2007 | 4 Comments | Posted in Taxes

How much would you pay to fight terrorism? Up until now, that kind of question was one that we as American’s didn’t have to answer - but that may be changing. Sen. Joseph Liberman is suggesting that American’s pay a “war or terror” tax which will help fund the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and fight terror abroad. Here’s the Senator’s argument:

“I think we have to start thinking about a war on terrorism tax,” the independent Connecticut lawmaker said. “I mean people keep saying we’re not asking a sacrifice of anybody but our military in this war and some civilians who are working on it.”

“When you put together the (Pentagon) budget and the Homeland Security budgets, we need to ask people to help us in a way that they know when they pay more it will go for their security,” he said during a Senate panel hearing on the defense budget request

Suggestions like these open up a few lines of thought in my mind:

  • Should we have special taxes to fund something like a “War on Terror” that has no clear, definite end? I’m not saying that it’s not a fair and just cause, but a special tax on something that will most likely never end just becomes a general tax.
  • If the general budget is strained by the war on terror, shouldn’t the Government become more “thrifty” in other areas to help supplant the defense budget? Is this even possible anymore?
  • Would the use of a special tax actually be a good thing because it will cause people to experience a personal burden of the war, thus causing them to evaluate it’s effectiveness?
  • I think I’d be somewhat be remiss if it didn’t cause me to truly think about the cost/benefit of the war against terror itself. I think the argument isn’t whether or not we should be doing it, but whether it’s being done correctly in a cost-effective manor.

I’m really interested to hear how each of you felt about the potential of a “War on Terror” tax. Is it worth it? Would you happily pay it? I’ll be sure to publish some of your comments in later posts.

US should weigh war on terrorism tax [Reuters]

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

How to stop nickel and diming yourself into the poorhouse!

February 5th, 2007 | 20 Comments | Posted in Debt, Frugal Living, Planning

When I made the decision to be more frugal with my finances, I knew that I had to cut out my major unnecessary expenses. In many ways, this was what was easy to do - look at my checking or credit card statement and locate the major expenses that I could could cut out and say, “Well by eliminating a, b, and c - I’m going to save $X amount of dollars.”

At least for me the problem was that I found myself still astonished by the amount of money I was spending every month. While those big expenses were hurting me, I found it was the little expenses that were killing me. Eating out a couple of times a week, even though it was at cheap places, began adding up. All of the times I’d stop to get a Red Bull during the week were adding up too. Basically, at $2 to $3 per expense, I was nickel and diming myself into the poorhouse.

I began to realize that I wasn’t being frugal at all, I had just decided to break the urge to spend $100 on DVD’s and iTunes music into a bunch of $2-3 splurges on little things. The worst part was that these expenses were flying under the radar unnoticed on my balance sheet.

Thankfully, I’ve been able to cut these expenses out of my balance sheet altogether. Here’s my XXX step plan on how I did it, and how you can too:

  1. Get real with yourself! Before you can even begin to do anything seriously with your finances (or really life in general), you have to “get real” with yourself and be honest and somewhat critical with the financial choices you’ve made. Remember the Red Bulls I told you I was buying everyday? Well I “thought” I needed them, in fact I’m pretty sure I was convinced I actually needed them. Look, I was tired! But the fact is I didn’t need them, and those little suckers add up in the end. Three months ago, I spent about $50 on Red Bulls alone. There’s a huge psychological difference between a few $2 charges or one whopping $50 charge, but if you’re going to “get real” with yourself, you’ve got to realize that in the grand scheme of things - there’s little difference.
  2. Identify where you’re nickel and diming yourself. Before you can even begin to cut out the problem, you have to realize where it exists. I suggest pulling out all of your credit card statements, checking statements, and any other form of documentation you have. When I did this I took a big legal pad and drew a line down the middle creating two columns. I named one side, “Gotta Have” and the other “Oops!” I then listed each expense I made the past month and put in the appropriate column. To be honest in the end, my opinion of my expenses was a different four letter word than oops! If you don’t have a checking account, ATM card, or a credit card you can still do this too. Just keep a running ledger of expenses for a month (which may skew your spending), or just try to think back what you’ve spent for the past few weeks or month.
  3. Once you realize you’ve got a “problem,” promise yourself you’re not going to make the same mistake twice. The best news about these little expenses is that when you realize you’re nickel and diming yourself here and there, it’s easy to cut them out altogether. Make a game out of it - see if you can go a day or two without spending unnecessary money. One of the things I’ve done is that whenever I spend money, I get a receipt and at the end of the day I pull them all out of my pocket or take them out of my billfold and I do a quick “trash can analysis” of my spending for the day. It worked for me, and it may or may not work for you - but if not, I’m sure something shockingly easy will. I promise you, it’ll add up quickly and the positive reinforcement you’ll get from a week, or even a month of cutting out the “small stuff,” will allow you to get the “big stuff” down the road.
  4. Stay “real” and hold yourself accountable. Just making decisions like these are only half of the solution. Action is often meaningless if you’re not going to set out to hold yourself accountable in the end. If you’re your own worst critic then you probably don’t need to - but setting up a “I Didn’t Nickel and Dime Myself to Death This Month Award” might be the perfect thing to keep yourself motivated and accountable. Personally, knowing that I achieved my goal and having some extra money in the bank account feels good enough and serves as my reward. The point is that whether there’s a pot of gold at the end of the month for yourself is just a detail, the fact is you’ve got to be real and honest with yourself as to whether you continued to nickel and dime yourself. If you found you have - the good news is you just found more ways you were nickel and diming yourself, and you know where you can cut out more expenses. If you found that you cut out the nickel and diming altogether - pat yourself on the back, but don’t digress back into silly spending!

Those four steps are the plan that I used to stop nickel and diming myself into the poor house. Sure, they’re pretty general and basic, but they get the job done. I’ll spare you the specifics, but by following the above plan I was able to cut out a HUGE chunk of my expenses. By doing so, I was able to accelerate my debt payments and sleep better at night.

If you have any ideas for ways to stop nickel and diming yourself into the poor house, leave them in the comments section or use the contact form seen above. I’d love to hear them!

Tags: , , , , ,

My Current Financial Situation (January Edition)

February 2nd, 2007 | 3 Comments | Posted in Planning

Since January is over, I felt it appropriate to update everyone on the state of my finances. Just to bring everyone up to speed, let me explain a little bit about who I am. I’m a law school student in my early twenties, who’s accumulating quite a bit of student loans with the anticipation of a fruitful career. I hate to get into specifics, but it costs about $25k per year to goto the law school that I attend, and while I don’t borrow that full amount every year, I’m awfully close to it.

In addition to that debt, I have roughly $2K in credit card debt that I accumulated during trips to New York and various other places. Up until now, roughly half of it was interest free and the other half was sitting around 8.9% APR. Within the next week or so, 100% of the balance will be transferred to a 0% account.

Many of you may frown upon the credit card debt, and I feel a sense of frustration with it myself - but I promise you my money is better spent elsewhere. I do plan to have the entire balance paid off before the end of the year. I just didn’t want to touch savings or any money from my brokerage accounts because I felt the money was best suited there. This of course assumes I can maintain a 0% APR on the debt. Whatever portion of the balance remaining by the end of the year, which will hopefully be none, I will pay for outright with money from savings.

So, for the month of February, I have a few financial goals:

  • Complete switch of credit card debt to 0% APR accounts.
  • Make a minimum of 1/12th payment to credit card debt.
  • Pick an ETF to begin accumulating a position within.

Monday, I’ll post about some of my personal goals!

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Identity theft losses fall - does it really matter?

February 1st, 2007 | No Comments | Posted in Economy

It turns out that losses from identity theft fell from $55.7 billion in 2005, to $49.3 billion in 2006. This is certainly positive news in terms that society was affected less by identity theft, but when you look at the problem as a whole it’s still a staggering effect.

The average identity theft fraud fell 9 percent to $5,720 from $6,278, while the median - where half were larger and half were smaller - held steady at $750.

I guess that’s encouraging, but I find it interesting that the median loss remained the same. Part of the reason asserted for the drop is that Americans have become more vigilant in protecting their identity. I’d really like to know if the actual number of cases of identity theft have dropped, and then if so - what the demographic breakdowns were among Americans.

Identity theft losses fall to $49.3 billion [CNN Money]

Tags: , ,